Thursday 4 August 2011

Slaughterhouse Five - Kurt Vonnegut (or more evidence of my poor memory)

The narrator of the book is preparing to write about his experiences in Dresden during WWII. He even goes as far as contacting an old army buddy but still doesn't bring himself to write it. He then visits Dresden again with his friend and he decides to write a story. Billy Pilgrim was also in Dresden. He's a time shifter. He can't control it but shifts through time to see different aspects of his life. He knows how he will die, what his children will become and he sees the plane crash that only he survives. However, it's thanks to the Tralfamadorians (aliens who kidnap him) that he learns to accept it. They can see in the fourth dimension so also know what will happen. It can't be changed so they focus on the good things and close their eyes to the bad.

I read this the first time about seven years ago. I didn't enjoy it although I didn't hate it either. I didn't understand what everyone seemed to love about it. A few days ago I read an article about the book in the guardian. It mentioned that a school in the US had banned it for it's language. I honestly couldn't remember there being much bad language. I thought if it had been so bad then surely I would have remembered it more clearly. That's the only thing I was right about (there is bad language in the book but it's fairly mild compared to a lot of other books). I read this book and it was honestly like I was reading it for the first time. I remember absolutely nothing! A good thing possibly as I absolutely loved it this time round.

Billy Pilgrim seems like such a pitiful character and yet I liked him. He's a harmless man who is just trying to get through life. He knows what will happen to him and is happy to accept that. Or maybe not happy but not completely unhappy either. He is accepting of what will happen. His time shifting is unpredictable apart from his time in Dresden. His other parts of his life are viewed forwards and backwards but Dresden is viewed in a continuous line putting it more in focus than the others which is the point I think.

I think the time shifting and being taught to accept the inevitable gives the book a hint of sadness. The character Billy and events during WWII also do that but I think his acceptance thanks to moving through time emphasises the sadness.

I am glad that I read this again. I must have been asleep when I read it the first time. It's the only explanation for being unable to remember a word of it. It's now a firm favourite and I look forward to reading more Vonnegut in the future.

7 comments:

  1. I have been wanting to read this as long as I know. I hope to get to it soon. I agree some books do read better when you grew up a little. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is one of those books I've had on my must read list for years. I keep getting distracted by newer, shinier books though. Thanks for the reminder.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bibliojunkie, it's definitely worth a read. It's quite short too. If it hadn't been for work I would have read it in a couple of hours. I think you are right. There are some books that you do appreciate when you grow up but I don't know how I managed to completely erase any memory of the story.

    Ryan, I know the feeling. I have actually been meaning to give it a re-read for a while because so many people loved it and were shocked that I didn't. If it hadn't been for this article it would still be sitting there unappreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is one of those books I have been meaning to read for ages. All those controversies and all ...

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's well worth a read. Some of the controversy must be about what it says about some religion. There is some bad language in the book but not enough to ban it. IMHO anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love this book, but I don't agree with a lot of the author's morals and ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Interesting. What was it you don't agree with? His idea of fatalism? Not sure I agree with that either.

    ReplyDelete